Topps later issued the cards in cellophane-wrapped strips ("cello packs"). days nor more than 60 days before the deadline for filing for election in the year in which. The original selling price was five cents per package. The cards were issued five to a wax pack and were accompanied by facsimiles of paper currency of the Confederate States of America. A Spanish-language version was issued by Topps in 1968, with predominantly different artwork.
#Civil wart file cards plus#
Ī similar series with the same artwork was later issued in Canada and A&BC produced a similar set in England, plus a French-language version for sale in France. While the fronts of the cards featuring painted art several artists (mainly Norman Saunders, but also Wally Wood and Bob Powell), the backs were designed as a newspaper, telling the history of the American Civil War through a brief history of a campaign battle or person presented in a newspaper article-like fashion, complete with a headline. Rodriguez/Buck, 347 Or 58, 217 P3d 659 (2009).The complete set consists of 88 cards, including a checklist, and was first printed for the United States market in 1962 to coincide with the centennial of the American Civil War. Arnold, 214 Or App 201, 164 P3d 334 (2007) Three nonexclusive factors to determine whether a sentence is disproportionate, under Article I, section 16: “(1) a comparison of the severity of the penalty and the gravity of the crime (2) a comparison of the penalties imposed for other, related crimes and (3) the criminal history of the defendant.” State v. Area(s) of Law:įor accomplice liability, “ person is criminally liable for the conduct of another person constituting a crime if: … ith the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the crime the person: … ids or abets or agrees or attempts to aid or abet such other person in planning or committing the crime.” ORS 161.155(2)(b) A sentencing court could conclude that a defendant was disqualified from receiving a lesser sentence under ORS 137.712 if the victim suffered a significant physical injury in the course of a crime, regardless of whether or not the defendant being sentenced had personally inflicted that injury.” State v. The risk of serious physical harm need not be ‘imminent’ or “immediate” all the statute requires is that the person be unable to provide for such basic needs that are necessary to avoid such harm ‘In the near future.’” State v. "We recently explained that the term ‘serious physical harm,’ as used in that statute, “means bodily harm that is serious enough that a person who suffers that harm is unsafe in the absence of commitment, treatment, or other amelioration of the physical condition.” State v. A ‘person with mental illness’ is defined to include a person who, because of a mental disorder, is “nable to provide for basic personal needs that are necessary to avoid serious physical harm in the near future, and is not receiving such care as is necessary to avoid such harm.” ORS 426.005(1)(f).
#Civil wart file cards trial#
“In a continued-commitment proceeding of the kind involved here, the trial court’s task is to “determine whether the person is still a person with mental illness and is in need of further treatment.” ORS 426.307.
0 kommentar(er)
